Thoughts on Me Kathawa
You stand before a large door with an intricate design and
gold mixing into the brown of wood. You are taken aback by the beauty of this
door. This what it feels like reading the first page of Sureka Samarasena’s Me
Kathawa. The cover and the first page of the story, white letters on black
paper, makes you have great expectations about what’s in store for you. So you
open the door and to your disappointment you find an ordinary house, the kind
you won’t remember after you leave it. You walk through the house in hope of
hidden treasures, but besides a small jar of emotion at the very end, you leave
from the back door feeling empty.
Me Kathawa isn’t a bad book. I tend to buy books I’ve never
heard of and so I’ve read quite a number of crappy books. I wouldn’t put Me Kathawa
to that category, but I wouldn’t call it a good book either. It’s entirely
subjective if a book is good or not, so this is merely my opinion.
When I saw the cover (it’s absolutely beautiful) and when I
read the first page, I thought, “I need to buy this book right now!” I ended up
not buying it, simply because it wasn’t a book I would want to have with me at
all times.
And here’s why I didn’t like the story.
I would call a story good if it in anyway strikes a chord in
me and if it leaves me with something. So basically, I would say I like a book
depending on how it affects me during the journey through it and how I felt
after.
While reading Me Kathawa, I felt nothing. It was like
listening to a grandparent tell a story and waiting for the climax. Except you
never get there in this story because it’s not the kind of story that, I felt,
gives into the traditional storyline or ‘how the story should flow’ guidelines.
While there is a beginning and ending, it didn’t feel like the story was trying
too hard to be a story. This I liked. No, this I loved about Me Kathawa.
However, even such stories can move me in some way. In fact,
reading Me Kathawa was like reading an article. I’ve felt this before when
reading another journalist’s short stories. However, it didn’t feel like
reading an article for the first time. It was like rereading your own article
to reduce the number of mistake before you send it to the section head. You
read it in a bored, ‘I’m just trying to get to the end of this’ manner.
Further, the book’s blurb implies it will be a female’s
story. And it is. It is about three-four generations of women. You’d think it’s
the kind of book feminists would use as a weapon. However, it didn’t feel
strong enough. It was like drinking weak tea. You drink it, but you are
embarrassed to even call it tea. And this isn’t because the women aren’t
victims here but because not enough happens. This could be because, as Samarasena
said at the book launch on July 9, half the story didn’t make it to the final
book.
I haven’t read many Sinhala books. So this sort of story
could be new to (modern) Sinhala literature but I’ve read this sort of story
before. It felt more like reading an online article on Arundathi Bandara. It
made you wonder why the story was published.
I like big books. I love big books. This is because I’m
given time to get used to the author’s language, to get to know the characters
and imagine myself in the book’s world. Me Kathawa is tiny. I’ve seen poetry
collections that are thicker. You can’t judge a book by its size but before you
can warm up to the book, the story ends. However, an author, if skilled, can
involve the reader in just a few pages or paragraphs. For instance, Malak Katha
Karayi by Isuru Chamara Somaweera, one of the few short story collections I’ve
read and maybe the only collection I love, involved the reader in the story
even though the stories were only a few pages long.
So the book didn’t move me or affect me while I was reading
it.
I had hope that maybe the book would make me feel something
after I read it. I remember how, after reading On Sal Mal Lane by Ru Freeman, I
felt all these emotions slam into each other. I felt torn, as if something had
been taken away from me. This is what a good book can do to me.
Did I feel that way about Me Kathawa? No. I read it, I put
the book back in my bag and went on Twitter and Facebook. I felt so empty that
I didn’t even know if I liked or disliked the book.
It is nice. The story is nice, and it’s told nicely. But I
wouldn’t call it a good book.
However, reading the book did make me have an argument with
myself about books and the purpose of publishing a book. Now, I found Wave by
Sonali Deraniyagala to be a strong story. But I still don’t understand why she
had to ‘sell’ her story, her life and why at such a high price. While Me
Kathawa isn’t as expensive and it didn’t feel like Samarasena was ‘selling’ her
story, it made me wonder why she thought it should be published.
But who am I to ask that?
So why are stories published? What makes an author think his
story is good enough to be sold to people? During a time when most of what we
write, whether they are poems or stories, are published online for free and
accessible to people for free, one would expect only the best of the best to be
published. However, reading books, you realize that that’s not the case.
So what makes a story publish-worthy? I would assume it
should have the ability to move the reader. If a story is empty, then what are
you giving people? Are you giving them a nicely done cover or good quality
pages? Are you giving them ink? You are giving them something of value. You are
giving them a part of you, your time and effort. You are giving them your
words. But when the reader pays money for your book and gets nothing but paper
and ink, are you selling something you shouldn’t be selling?
Again, let me tell you, whoever you are, this is merely my
opinion. Just because I didn’t like Me Kathawa doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be
read. There were many who seemed to have liked the book and many bought the
book at the launch. However, for reasons I don’t understand, the story, the
entire story, was basically discussed at the launch. Where does this leave the
people who hadn’t read her book? A trailer of a film shouldn’t give the viewer
the entire story. Likewise, book launches shouldn’t reveal all about the book.
And finally, let me just say that the plot was good. It could
have been a favorite book if only it had been told differently.
Comments
Post a Comment