Frangipani
(Before-post notes
#1: There are spoilers here and there. Marked by SPOILER ALERT! and SPOILER ALERT!- OVER
#2: I’m really, really bad at names. So if I’ve got any of
the character names wrong, please forgive and correct me.
#3: These are my personal opinions. Maybe the director didn’t
intend any of this. But I feel art is open to interpretation.)
Sometime back a friend told me about Frangipani, I watched
the trailer and had a feeling it was a must-watch film. It tackled issues that
Sri Lankan cinema is hesitant or afraid of even acknowledging and more than
that, it seemed like a nice film. But of course, back then there seemed to be
no way I could watch the film unless I found it online, which I couldn’t, so
imagine my happiness when I heard it was coming to local cinemas.
Then came the next problem. A friend and I wanted to watch
it but where could we watch it? Very few cinemas were showing the film, which
really is a bummer because people need to see this film. It need not be
everywhere we look the way Maya seems to be, but people need to see that such a
film is being screened and they need to go watch it. I very wrongly assumed people
wouldn’t miss a chance to watch the film.
My friend and I decided on City Cinema, Mount Lavinia,
because it seemed like the safest option for us, but they were screening the
film only at 10.30am. We got there at around 10.20 and found one other person
waiting to watch the film. We were told that unless there were five people,
they won’t be showing Frangipani.
The other person there to watch the film was a somewhat
elderly gentleman. He had been there for a while, I suppose, and during that
time, a couple had also shown interest in watching the/a film. When he reminded
the guy at the ticket counter of this couple (with them, there would be five of
us), the guy at the ticket counter explained that they mayn’t be watching the
film.
Before I could come to any conclusions about they were really
there for, he explained that a lot of people, especially couples, come to the
cinema intending to watch a film. However, hearing what the film is about, they
leave.
I was shocked to hear this. And I was angry too. But at that
time, I was more worried about not getting to watch the film. The guy at the
ticket counter assured us he’ll do his best to show it since otherwise it would
be unfair on the people who actually do want to watch the film.
Thankfully, three more people showed up and they screened
the film. And let me say this, very few films have made me react (tears,
goosebumps, etc.) to the film without it being a reaction towards a character.
It’s not that the characters are weak or uninteresting, because they aren’t,
but the film is such that I found it difficult to respond to individual
characters. It was the situations that got to me.
For instance, and this scene is in the trailer but SPOILER ALERT! There is a scene where
Sarasi is seated on the veranda of her house with Chamath. When she leans into
kiss him, he moves away. Then she starts hitting him. SPOILER ALERT!- OVER Now in this scene, I didn’t sort of respond
emotionally to only Chamath’s character for his inability to love Sarasi or Sarasi’s
character for wanting someone she can’t have.
This may seem like a weakness to some, where the characters
aren’t strong enough to affect the viewer. And this is perhaps something only I
felt when watching the film. But even now, two days after the film, I’m not
thinking about each character individually but as lives that intertwined and
cannot be looked at individually without one or both of the other characters.
What this does is that it doesn’t force you to play favorites.
SPOILER ALERT! When Nalin accepts Sarasi’s
offer to use one of her family owned shops for his own business, Chamath is
angry. SPOILER ALERT!- OVER And if
the characters weren’t so ‘can’t have one without the other’, I would have
agreed with Chamath. But in this film, you find yourself understanding Chamath’s
anger but also understanding why Nalin made that decision. And a film that can
do this is bloody good, in my opinion.
Now the basic storyline is a love triangle. Yes, it can be
boiled down to such a simple thing. Three people, two who have known each other
all their lives and one who is a recent addition to the group, want each other
in very different ways. And perhaps for this reason, a ‘love’ triangle is the
wrong word, because Frangipani isn’t a love story. Despite being about
friendship, intimacy, sexual attraction, etc. the film manages to not be a love
story.
You are introduced to Chamath and Sarasi right at the
beginning of the film. They’ve been friends since childhood and we find them
getting ready for a bridal wear collection their teacher is presenting for a TV
program. The first half of the film revolves around this TV program and it is
what gives us a look into the needs and wants of these three characters.
Nalin comes to the village to do some electrical work and stays
at the temple. Chamath’s brother, a monk, asks Nalin to help out with the TV
program and he ends up taking part too. Not too slowly, with very little
beating around the bush, various relationships quickly form between the three.
Sarasi is ill and as she says, her mother is looking for a
man for her. They both have their eyes on Chamath, but Chamath finds himself
attracted to Nalin. When the feelings are mutual, but Sarasi has expectations
from Chamath, they have a falling out. Chamath goes to the city to study
designing, while Nalin stays at the village and starts his own electrical
business and later, gets married to Sarasi. We then see how each of these
characters’ lives meet and part over time, with a somewhat clichéd but not bad
ending.
There are quite a few things I really liked about the film.
The main thing being that finally we have a film that doesn’t hint at homosexuality
through innuendo. It directly talks about not only homosexuality, but the
entire LGBTQIA community and also the various problems they face.
We see how men in search of men must hide behind bushes,
never being able to let down their guard and constantly risk being arrested. We
see how men are forced to choose the ‘safer’ option of marriage to a woman and
even having a kid or two in order to not be ‘caught’ by society.
The film also talks about the trans community, which I think
is incredibly important. One of the trailers they showed before Frangipani was
what they claim was Vijaya Nandasiri’s last film. 66 Mayam seemed to belong
with those films that are supposed to be funny but are mostly just offensive
and far from funny. The trailer shows a transvestite, typical in cinema, especially
Sri Lankan comedies. You have the garish makeup, shrill voice and exaggerated gestures.
They are mostly for comedic effect, a character to ridicule, laugh at.
Frangipani, thankfully, only portrays the trans community as
the humans they are. Chamath’s closest friend in the city is a transsexual and
she comes off as a friendly, helpful, caring person. And this isn’t done in a
way that feels like the director is trying to make a point. He is, of course,
but it doesn’t feel like he’s using the film as a way to force people to acknowledge
the LGBTQIA community in anyway. Instead the film and all incidents that happen
feel natural.
Related to this and the topic of sexuality, is how the
relationship between Chamath and Nalin progresses. SPOILER ALERT! When Chamath and Nalin first kiss, the scene is
intense, long and shows the desire between the two. SPOILER ALERT!- OVER I was worried the film will merely hint at
their relationship the way Giniyam Rae hinted at the girl’s bisexuality. But of
course, a film like this will never stoop to that level and so we saw these two
clearly-attracted-to-each-other men making out and later sleeping together
without the usual shame, confusion, anger, etc. that follows such a turn of
events.
Throughout the film, Frangipani talks about desire and needs
and wants and these are of a sexual nature. And it’s not only between Chamath
and Nalin. Films like Let Her Cry talk about women’s sexuality but it seems to
make it look very dark and twisted. SPOILER
ALERT! In Frangipani, Sarasi takes the initiative with Chamath. She kisses
him. She guides his hand to her breast. SPOILER
ALERT!- OVER The film acknowledges that women are sexual creatures and that
they are aware of their needs and desires.
And this is why I think it’s unfair to look at this film as
a ‘gay film’. The label is cringe-worthy, I know, but it is a label used by so
many people. I remember telling someone about this film and they said, ‘oh the
gay film.’ Sometime back when I told another person I wanted to watch Frangipani,
they asked if it was that film with two men. And so Frangipani has got that ‘gay
film’ label and I really think it should be removed immediately.
Because Frangipani isn’t about two men falling in love. It’s
not the gay version of those godawful cheesy love stories. It’s a film that
looks at so many aspects to society. You see how a family react’s to finding
their son dressed as a woman by having a thovile or exorcism. You see how a
monk reacts to the thovile but how he is also accepting if not also
understanding of his brother’s life. You see how a family is worried about an
unmarried young man because of what society may think. You see a girl pushed to
‘settle’ in life because her future is uncertain.
And this is why you shouldn’t watch the film looking for a
love story of any nature. In very natural ways, the director makes us question
our own beliefs, attitudes and opinions. Don’t we also make jokes about (and
this is a horrible but direct translation of a phrase I’ve heard too many times)
‘men in skirts’? Don’t we question not only the sexual orientation, but also
success, luck/fortune and sometimes even sanity of anyone who is unmarried? Don’t
we too think of homosexuality or transsexuality as an illness? And don’t we
also make the ‘safer’ choice instead of the one we really want to make?
And Frangipani successfully and beautifully addresses such
things without a condescending or confrontational tone. But this doesn’t mean
that the film isn’t ultimately also making people acknowledge and accept the
LGBTQIA community, especially in Sri Lanka.
We, for some reason, treat the LGBTQIA community like a
relative who did some godawful thing and so although still a part of the
family, isn’t acknowledged and is treated as nonexistent. And yet, each and
every member of that family knows about the relative and what he or she did, but
they refuse to talk about it.
Everyone knows that heterosexuality isn’t the only way of life.
We know that sexual desire and romantic feelings aren’t that black and white.
And yet, we refuse to acknowledge it, perhaps in fear that we will be labeled
something we aren’t or aren’t ready to admit. But Frangipani, especially by not
being a film one can only watch at film festivals or special screenings, has
made people accept that the LGBTQIA community in Sri Lanka is very much in
existence but also that it faces a lot of injustice due to unfair laws that
need to be changed and social beliefs and attitudes which also need changing.
Religion plays a huge role in our lives and whether we
really understand what religion is about and whether we really believe in what
we claim to, we will be tied to religion, sometimes not even by choice. One of
the main arguments made by Camp Heterosexuality is the Only Way of Life is that
religion says homosexuality is sinful. ‘God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and
Steve’, right?
Buddhism plays an odd role here. Admittedly, my knowledge of
Buddhism is quite low, but from what I’ve read and learnt, the Buddha never
said that homosexuality is wrong or sinful.
Frangipani makes use of this aspect to Buddhism, which all
these ‘Sinhala Buddhist’ types may not like. Chamath’s brother who is a monk
never gets preachy about Chamath’s life. The only time we see any opposition is
when he tells Chamath that there is some turpentine that can be used to remove
his nail polish. Later, SPOILER ALERT!
when Sarasi shows the monk a picture of Chamath all dolled up in a dress, there
is nothing but acceptance. SPOILER
ALERT!- OVER
Such monks, I’m sure, are rare but honestly, if the clergy
speaks more, not only about the LGBTQIA community, but the various issues we
all face in society, whether it’s homophobia, racism or sexism, then I feel,
society will change sooner. But for some reason, the clergy remains more or
less silent, maybe hesitant to stir the pot.
But the pot needs to be stirred, and I’m glad Frangipani is
here to do that. Because while making a point or talking about the LGBTQIA
community, it is also ultimately a beautiful film with such easy to love and
understand characters. It’s a film that will make you emotional and want to
just sit with the characters and talk to them.
I’m not saying Frangipani is flawless. It has its moments,
but overall, it’s a must-watch film. And if you’ve been over the fence about
watching it, just give it a shot (And take me with you because I’d like to
watch it again).
Comments
Post a Comment